Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Sandy Spring Museum Along Route 108 in Sandy Spring

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



[Click on any picture

 for a larger image]

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Pictureboard

Picture Show

Approved AMP

Site Plans

AMP Documents


Home

Derrick's Addition (Northeast Corner)

ezStorage

Bentley Road Nursing Home

Thomas Building (Goddard School and Offices)

Resurrection

Baptist Church

Chevy Chase Bank


About SSARPC

Join Our Email List

Support Our Efforts

Let Your Voice

Be Heard!

Documents and

Announcements

Next page Last page

Page 1 of 5

Ashton Meeting Place Update

June 18, 2007

Question:  What is the purpose of the meeting?

Answer:  The AMP developers have recently submitted a new plan for the Planning Board to consider.  SSARPC believes that the Ashton community needs to be briefed on the implications of the new design.  The next public hearing on AMP is scheduled for June 28, 2007, time to be announced.

Question:  What is SSARPC’s opinion of AMP’s plan?

Answer:  SSARPC is opposed to the new plan for a variety of reasons, including failure to adhere to the Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan, failure to adhere to the parking zoning requirements, and failure to address some of the concerns raised at the April 12th hearing. 

Question: What are the recommendations in the Master Plan with which the plan must be consistent, and how is the Ashton Meeting Place proposal inconsistent?

Answer:  There are several recommendations that the proposal is not following, including:

  1. Master Plan on  Density

The 1998 Master Plan states, subject to minor changes of no relevance here, that the “1980 plan recommendations for limited commercial use and moderate to low-density residential use are confirmed.”   The recommendations from the 1980 Master Plan include limiting the commercial development in the village center, and characterize possible 60,000 square feet of development on 6 acres at the NW corner of New Hampshire and MD Route 108 (7-Eleven shopping center) as “appropriate in more urbanized areas but …inconsistent with the scale of uses envisioned for a village center.” Ashton Meeting Place as currently proposed (97,000 square feet on 7.4 acres on another corner of the same intersection) is considerably higher in density than what the 1980 Plan stated was inconsistent with the village center concept.

  1. Master Plan on Scale 

The 1998 Master Plan seeks to “encourage development and revitalization of the village centers,” but it cautions that any increases in density “need to be balanced with the Plan intent to maintain the small scale of the existing centers.”

More...

Back to Home Page