Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Click for a larger picture Friends Meeting House, 1817, click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Sandy Spring, click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



[Click on any picture

 for a larger image]

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Pictureboard

Picture Show

Approved AMP

Site Plans

AMP Documents


Home

Derrick's Addition (Northeast Corner)

ezStorage

Bentley Road Nursing Home

Thomas Building (Goddard School and Offices)

Resurrection

Baptist Church

Chevy Chase Bank


About SSARPC

Join Our Email List

Support Our Efforts

Let Your Voice

Be Heard!

Documents and

Announcements

Next page Last page

Page 1 of 3

June 18th Town Meeting Summary

June 28, 2007

The Sandy Spring/Ashton Master Plan, originally written in 1980 and updated in 1989, defines Ashton as a rural area containing a number of historic homes.  The Master Plan specifies how development is to occur in order to maintain and preserve the rural atmosphere.  The Master Plan is designed to help preserve the rural character of the 280 year-old area as new development occurs.

On April 12th the Planning Board had a public hearing about the January 15th AMP plan.  At that time, because of the amount of public testimony, the Planning Board decided that deliberations would be deferred to a later date.  The Board asked the Staff to address several issues, including the definition of a rural village and more information about encroachment on the wetlands and wetlands buffer. 

On May 29th, the AMP developers formally submitted a new plan to Park and Planning. This is now the only plan under consideration; it supersedes all other plans previously submitted.  Since changes in the plan were substantial, it was decided that there will be one hour of testimony allowed at the public hearing on June 28th.

There are two SSARPC resources available online:  the presentation used at the Town Meeting and a handout that was prepared to help educate the community by answering a number of questions.  The following is a summary of the presentation.

AMP’s current design (see the presentation)

The current plan moves buildings and parking off the wetlands and wetlands buffers.  There are still two other major problems with the plan:  it does not support a number of elements of the Master Plan, and there are legal problems with the parking configuration.

Master Plan Concerns

  • The active fronts have been removed from Route 108 and replaced with a long wall with fake windows.  At each end of the wall is a single store or office.  “Active store front” means you can enter a building from the front, right off the street. 
  • Pedestrian access is limited.  To get to the stores, pedestrians will have to walk along Route 108 or New Hampshire Avenue to an entrance that either crosses one or more drive aisles or a loading dock area.  The green space at the corner of Route 108 and New Hampshire Avenue is now very small and will no longer serve as a welcoming area for pedestrians. 
  • The stores are not compatible in size to stores in the neighboring area.  The proposed anchor store is several times larger than the Alloway Building on the other side of New Hampshire Avenue.  The presentation shows the size of neighboring stores along with the current design, and the compatibility issue is very obvious.
  • The size of the development is too much for the space available.  The AMP developers have asked for a waiver for 26 out of 335 parking places, which would otherwise occupy approximately 10,000 square feet.  The Planning Board can approve the waiver, but, in order to do so, it must rule that it would improve safety or reduce congestion.

More...

Close Window

Back to Archives Tables of Contents

Current Ashton Meeting Place Information

Back to Home Page