Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Wyndcrest Historic House Mt. Airy, 1799, 1845

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



[Click on any picture

 for a larger image]

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Artist's drawing of the final Ashton Meeting Place landscape plan

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Looking southeast from the intersection of Routes 108 and 650, over the corner green, with retail stores on the left and the Sandy Spring Bank on the right

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Conceptual drawing by SSARPC's architect, Miche Booz, of an alternative AMP design, presented at a Planning Board Hearing and later adopted by the developer as the basis for the latest AMP plan.

Pictureboard

Picture Show

Approved AMP

Site Plans

AMP Documents


Home

Derrick's Addition (Northeast Corner)

ezStorage

Bentley Road Nursing Home

Thomas Building (Goddard School and Offices)

Resurrection

Baptist Church

Chevy Chase Bank


About SSARPC

Join Our Email List

Support Our Efforts

Let Your Voice

Be Heard!

Documents and

Announcements

First page Previous page

Page 2 of 2

Ashton Meeting Place continued, page 2

AMP Design Submitted to County

Development Review Committee Meeting

Took Place on Monday, October 22

The Ashton Meeting Place (AMP) plan has been submitted by the developer to the Montgomery County Park and Planning Staff.  The Development Review Committee Meeting took place on Monday, October 22.  The public was able to attend and observe; however, there was no opportunity for observers to voice opinions at that time.  A development Review Committee Meeting allows the Park and Planning Staff and staff of other reviewing agencies such as State Highway Administration and County Department of Permitting Services to give their comments on the plan to the developers.  At such a meeting the developers may be required to make additional modifications in some cases, or may be given the “green light” to proceed to a public hearing with the Planning Board.  The comments of the Planning Staff were generally positive, with a few exceptions.  The developer has been working to address those exceptions.

For several months, representatives of the SSARPC Steering Committee have been working collaboratively with the AMP designers on the development of the plans.   Overall, the Committee is pleased with the latest plans that were submitted as they, for the most part, implement the Sandy Spring/Ashton Master Plan’s vision of a rural village center. There were two items that we still had concerns about, and which were relayed to the developers:

  1. In the submitted plan, the “village green”, a grassy area at the corner of Route 108 and New Hampshire Avenue, has walkways around the perimeter.  However, we believe there should be some type of walkway that cuts diagonally through the green area in a direct route from the crosswalks at the intersection to the interior of the shopping center; if not, there will likely be a dirt path across the grass created by pedestrians who tend to seek the most convenient route.
  2. The plan for Building #1, which will be next to the automobile entrance on Route 108 had no doors on the street.  There will be entrances from the east side and back of the building, but without an entrance from the street, the building will not have an active store front (as it is called for in the Sandy Spring/Ashton Master Plan) and pedestrians will have to walk around the building to enter.  This arrangement would make it inconvenient for those who park in the parallel parking spaces on Route 108.

It is encouraging that the developer is continuing to work with us in addressing these issues.

It's not too late to voice your opinions to the Planning Board, Planning Staff, and the community.

New AMP Design Unveiled

On Tuesday, August 7, 2007, Fred Nichols and Phil Perrine, representatives of Ashton Meeting Place (AMP) held a public meeting presenting their new design for AMP.

Some historical perspective:  On June 28, the Montgomery County Planning Board denied approval for the developer’s then current design.  Afterwards, representatives of the developer met with selected members of the community, including SSARPC Steering Committee representatives, and developed a new, substantially different conceptual design.  More detail was later added to the conceptual design and it was presented to the public on August 7.  Public meetings are required by the Montgomery County Park and Planning Commission before a developer can submit plans for consideration.  The AMP developers plan to submit their design to the Montgomery County Planning Staff very soon. 

Mr. Nichols said that the design is based on the conceptual design presented during the SSARPC testimony before the Planning Board by Miche Booz, a local architect who is on the SSARPC design committee.  Mr. Nichols indicated that changes to the details of the design are being made rapidly and that he would especially like to have input from the community during this phase.  The short time frame is needed in order to keep the State Highway Administration’s funding for improvements to the Route 108 and New Hampshire Avenue intersection.  The AMP designers will continue working with the SSARPC design team as further details are developed.  This meeting was the first time that the SSARPC saw the more detailed concepts for the building design.

More about the new Ashton Meeting Place Design...

Ashton Meeting Place Documents...

Back to Home Page