Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Clifton, 1742 Along Route 108 in Sandy Spring Cricket Bookshop Historic House Mt. Airy, 1799, 1845

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



Sandy Spring-Ashton Rural Preservation Consortium

 

The SSARPC (PreserveAshton.net)

supports development in Ashton that conforms to the Master Plan.

We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.

 

Public Hearing Schedule

 

The public hearing about Ashton Meeting Place (AMP) is scheduled for 2:00 pm on April 12 at the MNCPPC Building, 8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring.  There is parking behind the building.  At 1:00, there will be a separate but relevant presentation on Principles and Techniques for Small Towns and Cities to Accommodate Retail Growth and Enhance Community Livability” which is open to the public.

 

Ever since the fall of 2005 SSARPC has been working to influence and improve the AMP proposal, and encouraging community involvement and awareness.  The public hearing is the final official opportunity for public input.  We strongly encourage you to attend the public hearing, showing that you care about how AMP affects the Ashton community.  We plan on providing transportation.   Call 301-570-9065 or send email to ssarpc.reservations@verizon.net by Monday, April 9 if you would like to use the transportation.

 

The Planning Board considers the Planning Staff recommendations along with input from the developers and the community when making its decision

 

 

Planning Staff Recommends Denial

The Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Board deny approval for the Ashton Meeting Place (AMP) development.  Following is the Executive Summary, written by the Development Review Division, recommending denial of both the Preliminary Plan and the Site Plan.

 

Executive Summary

 

“Staff has concluded that neither the preliminary plan nor the site plan can be supported as submitted for several reasons.  Each of these issues will be discussed in detail and should be considered independently and on its own merits.  Regarding our analysis and recommendation, the preliminary plan and site plan conclusions are one and the same.

 

Outline of Denial

 

1)     The plan does not comply with Section 59-C-18.18 – Sandy Spring/Ashton Rural Village Overlay Zone, of the Zoning Ordinance.  The proposed development includes parking for commercial uses in residential zones.  The allowance for such parking is subject to specific conditions, and this project fails to comply with those conditions.

2)     The plan does not conform to specific language in Section 59-C-4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance related to the use of parking structures in the C-1 Zone.  The proposed development includes a parking garage, which is not allowed as a permitted or special exception use in the C-1 Zone.

3)     The proposed development does not substantially conform to the design guidelines for new development contained in the approved and adopted Sandy Spring/Ashton Master Plan and is not wholly compatible with the Master Plan.

4)     The locations of buildings, structures, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems are not adequately safe and efficient as required by Section 59-D-3.4.(c) of the Zoning Ordinance.  There are particular problems with the locations of buildings in relation to vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns that should be reconsidered and conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns that should be avoided.

5)     The plan fails to adequately protect environmentally sensitive areas as prescribed in Section 50-32.(c) of the Subdivision Regulations.  Structures, parking facilities, and storm water management facilities encroach into a wetland, wetland buffers, and stream buffers.  Staff believes the encroachment is avoidable and unnecessary.

 

The staff report describes the existing site, the proposed development, and provides an analysis of the reasons for denial.  It concludes with the necessary findings for both the preliminary and site plans.”

 

Note:  You can read the full staff report here.  But – beware – it is VERY large (94 pages of scanned text which will take a very long time to access without a high speed connection).  You can also obtain a copy of the staff report and review the complete application file in the Development Review Division (8787 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring) between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.

 

 

.

 

 

Date:         Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:08:26 -0400
From:         Sandy Spring-Ashton Rural Preservation Consortium
              <SSARPC@SSARPC.org>
Subject:      Updates on the Public Hearing

[Table of Contents]

First page Previous page

   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   

Next page Last page

Page 41 of 93