Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Sandy Spring Museum Along Route 108 in Sandy Spring

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



Sandy Spring-Ashton Rural Preservation Consortium

 

The SSARPC (PreserveAshton.net)

supports development in Ashton that conforms to the Master Plan.

We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.

 

Open Meeting to Discuss the Planning Staff

Response to AMP Proposal

 

On Saturday, April 7, from 10 am until noon, members of the SSARPC Steering Committee will be available to discuss the Montgomery County Planning Staff response to the Ashton Meeting Place (AMP) design.  The meeting will be held at the Sandy Spring Friends School in the lobby of the Yarnell Building.  When you enter Friends School, drive past the stop sign and park in the lot on the left.  The Yarnell Building is the first brick building on the right. 

 

SSARPC Steering Committee members will be there to discuss your ideas, let you know the SSARPC Steering Committee’s thoughts, and to answer questions that you may have.  Copies of the plan will be available for you to review.

 

The meeting of the Planning Board on April 12 is the last time for citizens to provide their input before a decision is made concerning the AMP development.  We hope that this open meeting will provide an opportunity for you to become more educated about the AMP development and why the Planning Staff is recommending denial.

 

 

Planning Staff Report Online

 

Late Monday the Montgomery County Planning Department of the Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC) made public the staff report on Ashton Meeting Place (AMP).   The staff report finds AMP to be non-compliant in the areas of

 

  • Zoning Requirements
  • Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan
  • Subdivision Regulations
  • Encroachment into wetlands, wetland buffers, and stream valley buffers
  • The locations of buildings, structures, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems not adequately safe and efficient

 

The full Staff Report is available at the MNCPPC web site.  It is 94 pages of scanned documents (20 MB) and has been found difficult to print by many people.   The MNCPPC web site offers some tips to help with printing.

 

In order to help those who have trouble with printing or perhaps do not with to read the entire document, we have extracted the first 23 pages of the staff report (1.8 MB), everything except the attachments.  There are two pictures in the 23-page documents, so we have extracted them and made available separately as the 23 page-document without pictures, the picture for page 3, and picture for page 4.

 

The documents are all PDF files.  If you do not have Adobe Reader 8, you should obtain it here.  If you do not have a program to view the JPG picture files, a free one is available at www.irfanview.com.

 

If you need assistance, write to ssarpc.help@verizon.net.

 

 

Date:         Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:24:38 -0400
From:         Sandy Spring-Ashton Rural Preservation Consortium
              <SSARPC@SSARPC.org>
Subject:      Learn More about the Planning Staff Response to the AMP Proposal

[Table of Contents]

First page Previous page

   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   

Next page Last page

Page 40 of 93